Ücretsiz evlilik sitesi tıkla üye ol.

Video izleyemiyorsaniz OPENDNS gereklidir.Ayarlar icin buraya tiklayiniz.

Videoyu Paylas

Video linki:

Embed Kodu:

Desertphile Diyorki:

Jun 3, 2007 - Why are you tel;ling scientists they are wrong? What is your education in the subject that makes all of the world's scientists wrong and you right?

evirus Diyorki:

Jun 3, 2007 - so your saying "no new information" which is compleatly false, increasing information can be evolved, and macro-evolution can be defined as evolution at the species level or higher(note; that has been observed)

a01011399 Diyorki:

Jun 3, 2007 - We have observed speciation, but we have never observed NEW INFORMATION

FlappyDraws Diyorki:

Aug 27, 2007 - A few hundred years in the future, people will look back on creationists in the way we look at flat-earthers today. Evolutionary theory has stood the test of 150 years. DNA evidence, fossil evidence keeps adding to it's support. The only people who are against it are people who believe biblical/quranic creation myths to be true. That should tell you something!!! Your explanation is pseudo-science.

JesusDisciple777 Diyorki:

Sep 25, 2007 - ive watched the first minutes so far, you are right on man, watch my series on "challenge for evolutionists"

JesusDisciple777 Diyorki:

Sep 25, 2007 - wow, i didnt realize you were doing challenge creationist thing too, ill have to watch your videos. peace

JesusDisciple777 Diyorki:

Sep 25, 2007 - everything this man says in this video is completely fact and accepted by science, even you ask real evolutionists they say they "believe evolution is true," they have "faith that the first cell can form naturally". all real scientists even evolutionists will say that it is a religion, so if you say otherwise you are completely ingorant

SIP100 Diyorki:

Oct 17, 2007 - HAHA there is *no* difference between the two you fools. What will show up in macro is the phenotype and it results from a change in the genetics (the SAME EXACT WAY it does in microbes) that results in the change in the phenotype size makes no difference you fools. Macro and Micro are con words there is only evolution. God you people are dumb.

Erech01 Diyorki:

Mar 27, 2008 - evolution has othing to do with increase in 'information' its about how that 'information' can change i.e. change in alelle frequency (which is what evolution is) the only difference between micro and macro evolution is timescale, this is wwhy biologists just say 'the theory of evolution' the dont have to differnt theories for each one cause they are the exact same thing accept timescale.

Erech01 Diyorki:

Mar 27, 2008 - only 'creation scientists' say such things as 'beliving that a cell can form naturally is religious faith' simply cause they lack what the word 'religion' actually means secondly i cant stand the term evolutionist or darwinist

Erech01 Diyorki:

Mar 27, 2008 - YEC are the new flat earthers.....totally agree

Erech01 Diyorki:

Mar 27, 2008 - 'We have observed speciation, but we have never observed NEW INFORMATION ' so???? your point being?

dfgggg Diyorki:

Nov 28, 2009 - FALSE ANALOGY! Imagine if those ingredients were subject to random changes, and the natural selective pressures were selecting traits that were closer to chocolate. Voila! Now it is analogous!

di739 Diyorki:

Jan 23, 2010 - Holy crap, this video is total fail. Couldn't even get the definition between Micro and Macro evolution correctly. But I suppose that if he did, he wouldn't be a creationist.

KennyTew2 Diyorki:

Mar 19, 2010 - WOW! This video hits every fail button available to it. Badly filmed, dull and factually inaccurate throughout. What a fucking retard.

bzeljn Diyorki:

Jul 19, 2010 - @a01011399 Define information, you moronic faggot.